Two Tales, or One?: On Ethiopia’s Federalism and South Africa’s Apartheid
By Tsegaye R Ararssa*
- 1. Introduction
What
is the story of the Ethiopian federal experiment? What stories does
it tell? And what stories can be told about it? Feeding from and into
the ever polarized and polarizing ‘debate’ on Ethiopia’s
politics, Dr Taye Negussie recently argued that the Ethiopian federal
arrangement is synonymous with apartheid’s ‘racial federation’.
In a similar vein, Dr Asfawossen Asrate also remarked that “ethnic
federalism amounts to nothing but apartheid.”[i] In
this piece, I seek to explore the tales the Ethiopian federal
experiment tells (and masks) with a view to shedding light on
whether, by juxtaposing the two systems, there emerges a tale of two
federations or two tales of two differently unjust governance
systems.
In
what follows, I will first offer a sketchy ‘description’ of the
federation in context. I will then discuss what to look for in a
federal system as its fundamental features. I do this in order to
determine whether the tale is of two federations in the strict sense.
Next, I will make an excursion into why, in spite of its deficiencies
and the injustices it masks, Ethiopia’s federation is not the same
as apartheid. Lastly, I submit the claim that while the Ethiopian
state practice can be likened to apartheid on many other grounds, its
adoption of federalism won’t be one of these grounds. Throughout
this piece, I argue that the story of apartheid and the story of the
Ethiopian federal experiment form two stories, two different tales,
of repressive governance systems, not one. For the story of apartheid
is not a story of a federation.
I
also argue that the story of the Ethiopian federation is a story, for
now, of ‘an unfortunate means to a legitimate end.’ It is
unfortunate because it is heavily contested and unnecessarily
so.[ii] Its
end is legitimate because it aims at restructuring the state on a
morally just set of premises.[iii] In
the longue
duree of
Ethiopian history, it can be told as a story of the first steps in
the unbreakable quest for freedom from the bondage of an
ethnicized/racialized hierarchy imposed by the Abyssinian Empire on
the ‘other’ peoples of Ethiopia. It is a story of a relentless
pursuit of ethno-cultural justice by (subaltern) folks who took a
stride towards emancipation through self-determination. It is a story
of devising an alternative model of ‘nation-and state-building’.
Owing to the current ‘authoritarian constitutional rule’ that
cunningly deploys law to mask the repression, co-optation, and
manipulation of legitimate national aspirations (thereby perpetuating
pre-existing injustice), federalism has not delivered the promised
emancipation. In excavating this story and responding to the inapt
association with apartheid, I will mainly rely on a close reading of
the Ethiopian constitution along with its immediate antecedents and
the story it tells about both the past and the future so that we can
locate the federalism in that story. By so doing, I will also
highlight, in passing, how different the assumptions, principles, and
goals that motivated apartheid are from their counterparts in
Ethiopia.
More:
Comments
Post a Comment